The Religion of Islam

In item, Hodgson argues that Occidental civilisation absorbed to a great extent benefits in its transmutation that structured it to break globally dominant from Islamic sociableisation and influence than it did from cultural exchange with Christianity. The resulting exchange between Islam and Christianity helped produce an Occidental finish that would rise to new heights of power and dominance in world history.

Aside from the above themes and points, Hodgson also underscores the significance of the undermentioned issues in Chapter Seven:

1) Occidental cordial systems were much more sculptural reliefrictive and offered less social movement than Islamic social systems.

2) Islamic peoples were attracted to ideas across many fields, from architecture to medicine, and this influence pervaded the rest of the world's cultures.

3) Different worldviews existed between Occidental and Islamic culture, with the former adopting a corporativist perspective and the latter a contractualist perspective.

4) Unlike Occidental culture, at that place was a real separation of religion and state (law) in Islamic culture.

5) medieval Christian religious practices were isolationist and stood in great contrast to the communal religious practices in Islamic culture.

(Hodgson 359-60[1], 342[3], 350[4])

Hodgson makes some very strong arguments for his points outlined above. One of these is the greater mobility and flexibility of Islamic social systems, and a higher ground level of advancement, that enabled individuals m

ore personalized liberty than Medieval Occidental culture. As Hodgson (351) notes "that same(p) Shari'ah, and in its own charge (together with the freedom of inner adaptation that went with it) ensured a wider range of personal liberty". However, what is unique in Hodgson's article goes deeper than just his interpretation of the greater freedom and personal liberty of Islamic gild as it contrasted with the restrictions imposed by Medieval Christian cultures. For he underscores the fact that many Westerners often see the personal responsibilities located by Muslim moralism as a defect. He points to the fact that the renouncing of formalism by Muslim culture led to a lack of protection of public law over underground rights.

However, he points out that the same moralism responsible for this kind of social structure with a lack of measures for "taming the social reality" however experienced greater mobility and personal liberties than its Occidental counterpart of the same era (Hodgson 351).

Another point Hodgson supports well is the greater conquest of Islamic religion in not diluting authority due to an autonomous structure of authorities like that of the Occidentals. As he states "Among the Occidentals, the devolution of authority to a multiplicity of autonomous offices had imperil to wipe out that very distinction between cliquish and public which had been inherited in earlier whiles" (Hodgson 347). This is what happened, he notes, despite efforts by legal authorities at the time to have such a great impact in a new setting. Yet, in the Muslim culture, Hodgson admits that where the Occidental culture took the public-private in social activity to an extreme the Islamic culture largely denied it. Yet, even though historians and a majority of Westerners shoot a superior view to Middle Eastern cultures ground on their alleged lack of sophistication, Hodgson points out the system of " office" in Islamic culture which not only sounds more evolved than th
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!