Analysis of Archibald MacLeish's novel "J.B." addressing the Theodicy question.

In Archibald MacLeishs novel J.B., Macleish attempts to tackle the theodicy question by, more or less, mirroring the romance of Job from the bible. But does this re bothy get the depute crosswise? Bad things clear to good people because, in the end, we ar every sinners to begin with, so we, as humans, should intromit that accompaniment that we argon at idols will and that if were to be punished, so as humans, we have that coming. But why? and is Macleish presenting an almost disparaging dash in which humans are addressed by God? Or is God flush half as regent(postnominal) as is believed? J.B. opens with Mr. Zuss and Nickles playing their parts as God and Satan. They are in the process of making a deal on how a good, moral, Christian man would react to everything he love being taken away; his children, his wife, his house, even his looks. J.B., the character mirroring Job, is a perfect and upright man, which is why they pick him for their game. To think that this would go on makes God automatically not at all omniscient, but apparently all powerful to have the world power to take all this away from J.B.

But even in the book of Job it states that His eyes are upon the ship render of a man, and He sees all his steps, so is it really obligatory to even have this display of power if God knows whats qualifying to happen? Another display of this apparent omniscient is after(prenominal) J.B. has his apocalypse that he cannot do anything but trust in Gods ways for taking everything from him, Mr. Zuss and Nickles are discussing the events, and nickels states to Mr. Zuss that he was right and Mr. Zuss replies of quarrel I was right. A! t... If you want to get a full essay, regulate it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper