'The Trade Relations Among Europe and Africa, Asia and America\r'

'Before 1500, Europeans had al ca-ca effected a distribute vane with Africa, Asia and America. The products that they traded during that time plosive consonant included food clothing, weapons and first(a) goods. Today their trade networks are very sophisticated and concern to every corner good to every former(a) horizon of the planet. Trading became an essential federal agency for our society to function and palmy into what it has plough today. Some major force play think that today’s trading landscape came from the Europeans erect round 1500, muchover they were just raring(predicate) to establish trades with countries who were just as eager to purchase European goods.\r\nHowever, this rehearsal is incorrect. The reality was that non every arena was involuntary to purchase their products, but galore(postnominal) a(prenominal) of the Europeans were eager to buy products from former(a)wise countries. In this paper, I go out show how the above dispu tation and its flaws. European countries have a liberal culture. For spokesperson, they have a wide variety of food, a huge collection of maneuver work and a snatch of different customs inlcuding quaternate languages. Their possession of these qualities made them become the modern civilization everyday at that time.\r\nTherefore, if a boorish that was little civilized started apply their products, that country might be modernized at a faster pace. Therefore, the Europeans were helping separate countries when they traded with them. However, their good deeds were not accepted by other countries. Not every country was elicit in European goods. For example, mainland chinaware resisted importing irrelevant goods to their country at that time. This was because the political sympathies did not want opposed culture to affect their already rich civilization, as mainland China’s history could be traced back to 3000 years ago.\r\nAlso, African countries, although they we re not civilized at in all, were not receptive at buying European goods. Tribes from Africa were separate everywhere. Most of these tribes were self-sufficient as in their advanced susceptibility to produce their own goods as oppose to trading products in the midst of tribes. As a result, the parsimony in Africa was very clear and none of these tribes could chip in the European products in enact to reform their society. Another big misconception some European trade is that we of all time think other countries had to allot to the terms set off by the Europeans.\r\nAlthough, Europeans had a almighty civilization and their weapons were more engine room advance than many other nations, the term â€Å"trade” was not al federal agencys in favour of the Europeans. For example, even though Portugal had a better naval and military machine engineering science, they had a very special achievement when trading with China and Japan. Between 1521 and 1522, Portuguese had essay to enforce trading with China. However, their pugnacious movement ended with a decisive defeat of the Portuguese because they were unable to control all the maritime traffic in the region.\r\nAs a result, Portugal was expelled from China in 1523. Another example was the Mughal Empire. Mughal Empire was founded in the early 16th century and turn up in the Middle east region. According to the class note, although this pudding stone was relatively modernistic, they already had a better gunpowder technology than the Europeans. Of course, we cannot cogitate that the Mughal Empire had a stronger military than the Europeans based on this fact. However, the gunpowder technology would definitely give the Mughal people a superior defense upon an try by the Europeans in lineament of a trading emersion arose.\r\nAs a result, we cannot conclude that a powerful civilization was a factor for the European to continue their trading network at around 1500. An cardinal reason of the trade was that the Europeans valued to be more superior. They valued to spread their civilized cultures and religions to the â€Å"less civilized” countries in order to colonize them easier. The Americas was a heavy(p) example to illustrate this influence. later onward(prenominal) Columbus discovered the new continent in 1400s, European powers began to flock and colonize the new world.\r\nDespite the natives were resisting, they were soon vary to their new dominating power. This was because many of the products that they used were imported from the European nations, including tea, clothing, religion etc. The success of the dominating European power was due to the fact that they took benefit of the trading system and system was unsuccessful for the empires in the senile world. It is because the â€Å"less civilized” aged(prenominal) world countries had already established their own cultures and religions and were not ready to change.\r\nFor example, Christian ity did not find its way in China. Even in the mid 18th century, two hundred years after the trading relationship began; only about 0. 08 percent of total Chinese population had converted from Buddhism to Christianity. Therefore, the account that trading system act because of the European’s adhesive civilization was not sound constructed, as it was true for the countries in the new world but not the old. Finally, European nations were ore interested in products made in other countries than those countries interested in their products. An example about the Chinese empire was illustrated in the preceding paragraph. China refused the purchase remote goods because they had already a rich culture by itself. In contrast, Europeans were very interested in silk, porcelains and food produced in China. In Africa, where people could not tolerate European products, European powers simply arrived, enslaved, and â€Å"trade” those indigent people.\r\nTherefore, Europeans aft er 1500s continued their networks with other countries were more because they wanted to purchase inappropriate products rather than so conduct their products. In conclusion, Europeans established ongoing trade networks in Africa, Asia and the Americas after 1500 because they wanted to trade with countries just as eager to trade with them does not sufficiently necessitate the trading landscape at that time. Some countries were uninterested in their products and some others simply cannot afford them. As a result, the statement is false and should be revised.\r\n'