How do religious believers respond to challenges posed to them by scientists? Essay

Challenges to religious belief started around the time of the renaissance, in the lead this the Church had almost complete control over peoples views, although criticisms were present. Since the totally literate people were generally monks or priests for a substantial amount of time, challenges to religion were dribbleed. However gradually times changed and with them so did attitudes. Although on that point were other arguments of a to a greater extent philosophical and theological nature in advance Galileos thinking of heliocentricity was one of the first arguments to challenge religion in a way it had never been challenged before scientifically. The idea that our manhood was the snapper of the universe that is to assign the geocentric view had been held since the time of Aristotle. This idea implies that the world is not the most important thing, just now another component in the vast universe this was the beginning of lore opposing religious ideas. this instant in tha t location are many challenges to the liveence of a creator specifically the Judeo Christian perfection who is responsible for the accounting system of the intromission of the world in Genesis. One of the major arguments against Genesis is Darwins theory of phylogeny. It says that contrary to the tommyrot of Genesis, humans evolved from apes and were not made, as we are now, on the 6th mean solar day of creation. Christians react very differently to this theory. some(prenominal) choose to ignore it on the whole arguing that science can make mistakes and evolution is still only a theory. They might say that if God is all powerful, nothing is insurmountable and we cannot see the bigger picture. Other Christians present theories such as irreducible complexity and intelligent design these are usually more self-aggrandising Christians. Some might say that the two ideas can be join saying that one asks how while the other, religion, asks why.On the matter of Creation itself th ere are many controversies. A young earth creationist would believe that the account of Genesis is completely true and that the earth is between 6000 to 10,000 years old. They would dismiss any scientific ideas perhaps saying that they cant overthrow God or maybe choosing to remain ignorant of scientific theories. If a scientist challenged this view using fossils as evidence, a young earth creationist may argue that God had put them there deliberately to test our faith.Some Christians and religious believers would say that we are not supposed to know everything because we wouldnt understand and its go against of Gods plan, they might say that if God had intended us to know then he would have include it in the Bible or the Holy Scripture belonging to the believer.religious believers that belong to Islam methodically reject Darwins theory of evolution and ofttimes refuse to discuss it. However Koran has a similar creation story to the Bible and thereof the same problem of days. Ma ny Muslims cry this is figurative and that days is supposed to mean period of time and therefore wriggle out of one of the challenges to their belief.Earlier while talking round evolution intelligent design and irreducible complexity were mentioned. These are favourite responses by more liberal Christians to problems created by science. Intelligent design is a modern extension of the teleological argument it argues that processes such as evolution are best explained by an intelligent cause and not just a random occurrence of mutations. It is therefore quite a frequent compromise for Christians, it doesnt contradict science and seems to unite the two science is true but God made it happen.Irreducible complexity is an idea by Michael Behe, an American biochemist. He says that certain organisms are irreducibly complex that is to say that if you follow the evolutionary chain back far enough, you come to a point where it cannot be broken down anymore, the whole thing, however simple, has to exist simultaneously. Behe uses the example of a mousetrap saying that without any one part it could not function. Behe is widely criticised and slated by scientist because he is filling gaps in scientific theory with God using little or no cover evidence, some say he has created a God of the gaps.Some more liberal Christians often present the Yom argument in the discussion of creation. The vocalise day is used in Genesis but it was translated from the Hebrew password Yom which government agency any period of time from 24 hours to an indefinite duette of time. Science clearly says that the entire universe was not made in an earthly week, using Yom as a period of time means that Genesis no longer has to say that the universe was made in a week, more just 6 stages. This can end the contradict of timescale to a certain extent.