Writing tips and writing guidelines for students,case study samples, admission essay examples, book reviews, paper writing tips, college essays, research proposal samples
Wednesday, 10 April 2019
Debate on Genetically Modified Food Essay Example for Free
Debate on Genetically Modified Food EssayFor millions of years, the gentleman has evolved and developed, by selective breeding to adapt into the golf club, which it is today. Natural adaptations and changes aim occurred in various species of plants and animals, which even modern scientists cannot explain. Our public has survived for well forever, without genetically enhanced produce, so why should it invade humanity now, just because we can? more than scientists, who are in favour of GM foods, claim that it is simply the next step on from selective breeding however they seem to retain overlooked one difference. Genetic modification of anything requires the introduction of stranger genes into a species, to modify it and this is certainly not a natural process. For example, GM Soya has been modified victimisation genes that will make it resistant to certain herbicides, such as roundup. Although this may seem like a good thing on the surface, what happens when the pollen from these GM foods is passed on to native species? Aspects like this seem to have been overlooked. It is alike a worry, because genetic engineering can be very unpredict adequate and the damaging effects of GM foods irreversible if left unconfined it could get out of control.It is possible to end up creating harmful characteristics such as toxins unawares. This doesnt necessarily condemn GMOs alone it proves the unpredictability of genetic manipulation. The establishment for GM foods is keen to strain up any findings, which may turn people against GM foods, (possibly due to the huge profits involved). ace particular scientist, in a report from the Rowett Research Institute, had been independently researching the effects of GM potatoes on rats.What his studies entrap was that they had a detrimental effect on the immune system and the growth of the rats. However when the establishment open this out, this man was reduced from being a well-respected researcher to a mad cap scie ntist. Although it is agreed that genetically modifying grain to include beta-carotene (vitamin C) may aid hunger and poor eyesight problems in third world countries, there is a large-scale scandal going on among large biotech companies, who want to increase their already large profits.GM food production, gives larger firms a loop hole in which they are able to abuse the power of modifying these crops to their own specification. Recently, there have been reports that these companies have developed doomsday seeds, which they want to conduct onto the world market particularly the struggling third world. These seeds have been genetically modified, so that once they have grown, the seeds they produce will genetically destroy themselves.These seeds may be an excellent money-spinner for the firms who sell them, but surely it is morally and ethically wrong to sell such seeds to poor and starving countries? The companies also have the added leverage over other seed producers because they are able to genetically modify their plants to grow quick and thus their seeds are cheaper than others. These people in the third world will eventually be labored into a downward spiral of having to buy new crops every year, because they are unable to afford the more expensive normal seeds.And what would happen if these genes happened to escape into the environment? GM genes may spread into wild populations with unpredictable and potentially harmful consequences In this case, they may even cause crops to produce sterile seeds, which could have an indecent effect on the ecosystem. If we are to have confidence in GM foods, then larger businesses should be kept out of research. The way GM foods are being exploited by powerful corporations is a threat to democracy.These crops are unsustainable in light of longer-term plans and the great majority of the GM market is focussed more on profit rather than improving our diet. Insufficient testing has taken place to ensure their refuge fo r public consumption. Research should be carried out independently, to assess whether such foods would be a benefit to our society and the effects it will have on the eco-system. Only then should they be allowed onto the market.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment