Background and Context of Personal Political Attitudes

But in the USSR, the communist elites had "a disproportionate amount of or so valued select" (137). In fact, they had disproportionate amounts of all valued resources. The turmoil of Russia today--even after USSR collapse--shows that this situation may non pee changed real much. hence on this issue I am closer to the ultraconservative view, against aid to Russia. But the reason for that seems to me to be liberal: the bankruptcy of the governing body to have policies of equality and justice.

To me, holding liberal beliefs actor that on issues of economic justice in general and in the flesh(predicate) justice in particular, the liberal point of view makes to a greater extent sniff out than the conservative view. Take the sentiment of economic justice, for example. Wilson and Dilulio cite the term social welf are (132). Social welfare refers to health care, jobs, and basic survival needs. This is a term that refers to all of Ameri potful society, non just a part of it. Thus it is not easy to see why the political relation should not be involved in promoting the social welfare for all the people. No other institution of America is in a survey to do so. Private industry or private charities as a whole do not seem to be involved with all the people. Private industry is concerned with qualification profits in industry and taking care of their employees and customers. This leaves forth those who are not employees or customers but who may have the same needs. Private c

Sometimes, in fact, there was so much choice that it was hard to make up one's mind what to choose. My parents had this experience even more than I did. In some slipway they are old-fashioned. They hold on to Armenian ways of thinking rather than adopting American ways of thinking. Their close friends are almost all Armenian, and they have not been exposed to very many different kinds of people in America. In some ways they find comfort in the idea that government will make decisions and choices for them. My views are different because I would homogeneous the government to help if help is needed. But I do not want the government making important choices for me. I prefer the government to be on the side of personal freedom.

But to my parents, personal freedom seems like a hulky risk. In the USSR they were not used to so much hesitancy as they find in the U.S. today.

In other words, government should include, not exclude. That is a big difference between the U.S. and USSR authorised policies. Along the same lines, government should not impose itself on person lives. In the Soviet Union, government regulation of individual thought, job choice, and so on was intense. In the U.S., there is not this regulation. On the other hand, according to Wilson and Dilulio, conservatives want government to flummox very personal behavior, such as abortion choice or sexuality. This kind of regulation seems to go against the very idea of American freedom, and that is why the liberal view makes more sense than the conservative view. In this regard, Wilson and Dilulio describe "pro-life" protests (136-7) against abortion. The book does not include "pro-life" shootings or bombings of abortion clinics, which are in the daily news. But it is hard to see how bombings or shootings that pop out are pro-life. And so it is hard to see how there can be conservative support for "pro-life" ideas that kill. Those ideas, in fact, should be called "anti-choice." This kind of contradiction leads to a conclusion that the
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!