Some sources I consulted ar pro-corporate, arrogantly ignoring any concept of workers' rights. At the other extreme are those who see the whole act of surveillance - euphemistically referred to as " supervise", which somehow seems less like spying - as the personification of George Orwell's nightmarish vision of a future in which two-way television controlled by Big Brother watches any aspect of a citizen's life. In between are those who discontinue both business and employees their respective rights, and try to find a balance between them.
In the narrow context I will acknowledge the right of businesses to surveil their employees to some extent, since illegitimate design of company computers is not what they w
One of the key reasons cited by corporations for the necessity of monitoring employees' use of company computers is their legal liability for misuse.
In the late mid-nineties the Chevron Corporation was required to pay four pistillate plaintiffs $2.2 million in damages because of the alleged sexual badgering resulting from finding an email on the company server that make a series of jokes on the theme that "beer is better than women" (Hartman 1998).
George, Joey F. Computer-based monitoring: common perceptions and empirical results. MIS Quarterly, 12/1996. v20 n4 p459 (22).
She goes on to point discover that in "'technological thinking' the distinction between people and things becomes blurred, and as a consequence there is no need to take the uneven abilities and vulnerabilities of persons into account" (ibid.).
None of this should give us any self-reliance that if left to their own devices profit-making entities will balance the rights of employees with their own perceived self interest when it comes to the matter of keeping tabs on their workers.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment