Relics & Preservation

Valid interpretations stool be diametrically opposed to each other, but historians' conclusions will be always tested against what is known, and judged by how they conform to methodological constraints. Thus, heavy scholarly history--and even most popular history--has no earshot unless it is, in these senses, sound. A relic, on the other hand, is present and can be, and often is, experienced without the intervention of oft historical knowledge. The conservation of relics serves historical purposes, of course, but, in many cases, those who present a maintain site be perfectly aware of how uninformed much of the consultation will be. This raises many questions about economy. These are not questions about the value of relics to historians or to those who commit, or will gather, large information to place the relic in some broader context. They are questions about what delivery groups, governments, communities, and individuals are saying about the past(a) when they select, conserve, relocate and/or present these relics. And they are questions about who the audience is believed to be and how the actual audience responds to what is preserved.

Winks notes that there are numerous differences between rescue movements in different countries because each of them is "the yield of a unique historical world-view" (141). But such instalment of constituencies continues all the way down

Hosmer, Charles B. preservation Comes of Age: From Williamsburg to the National Trust, 1926-1949. Vol. 2. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1981.

If it is difficult to assess the spectrum of reactions of visitors to historic sites, it is just as hard to say whether the motivation for their preservation "has its roots in a tendency, a practical need, an impulse, or a conscious logical thought" (Erder 15). Are aged buildings in metropolis-centers, for example, preserved because there is a general look that this is a good thing to do? In a discussion of the 1930 destruction of H. H.

Richardson's Marshall Field Warehouse (1885-87) Hosmer notes that the single protest against this action came in 1936 when architectural historian total heat Russell Hitchcock said this and other razed buildings "should have made simoleons a center of pilgrimage for all who are enkindle in architecture" but the money and effort that could have saved them were expended on an "ironical 'Century of Progress' exposition" (quoted in Hosmer 1058). The preservation movement that could have saved such buildings did not pay back until after World War II. But Hitchcock was instrumental in initiating what is now a general tendency to think in two ways about destroying such structures and it is interesting, therefore, to note how he attempts to equate preservation of the past with progress; the destruction of the nineteenth-century buildings made a mockery, he argued, of an exposition dedicated to the notion of progress. True progressives now take on the preservation of the past, and the maintenance of continuity with history, as a major consideration for city planners.

In many instances, of course, the preservation of the city core can be the result of a logical, considered conclusiveness that balances aesthetic, historical, economic and other practical considerations. Fitch notes, for example, the French declaration to the problem of the Parisian district known as the Marais, which is a center for highly speciali
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!