Oedipus the King suggests that people ultimately have little control over their own lives.

The free will versus fate debate dates back to out front 500BC. Some people believe that fate dominates a someones stainless life, that all in timets are inevitable. Others feel that we are free to view as choices in life and that nothing is certain. In the play Oedipus the King, the author Sophecles demonstrates through the Gods and the oracles what little influence the characters in the play much(prenominal) as Oedipus, Creon and Jocasta contract over their own lives as closely as using the townspeople to show that they too have no choice due to the controls on society. Through the social function of the fate versus free will idea that runs throughout the play, Sophecles suggests that humanness ultimately has a decided fate, with little or no power to choose.

Oedipus is a prime example of a person who has no choice in how to live his life, his fate decided at birth with an oracle that destined him to kill his produce and marry his mother. Although he did not discover this fortune until much later in his life, when he did learn of the oracle, he at a time fled away from the people whom he thought to be his parents and traveled to Thebes, fulfilling the first part of the oracle along the way without even realizing.



After solving the Sphinxs riddle and becoming King, Oedipus then became wed to his mother who happened to be Queen of Thebes. All along Oedipus believed he could choose, that his decisions would ensure that no such horror would ever get it on to pass but as he finds out in the end he was foolish to think he could get around the oracles because no matter how great he was, he was mute a man and mortal man must continuously look to his ending.

Another example...

If you want to get a full essay, line of battle it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper