Analyzing a Published Work

Analyzing a Published Work Overview One of the roughly meaning(a) moves academic writers can master is the art of analysis. This assignment go away help you to develop the skills necessary to determine the meaning found indoors a text. To be clear, the intent of this testify is not to argue for or against the content instead, we are analyzing what the term does in terms of the following 1. nominate, 2. approach, and 3. effectiveness. fitting Go to an online newspaper website Chicago Tribune http//www. chicagotribune. com/, http//www. ansascity. com/, or http//www. ny snips. com/ are a a few(prenominal) possible sites, but feel free to use a to a greater extent local newspaper website. Find an article in the Op/ED discussion section that is argumentative in nature. Use the following questions to guide your analysis 1. What is the place of the text? In other words, what exactly is the position the article takes and/or what does the author want his or her readers to believe a nd/or do after reading the article? 2. What strategies does the text use to attempt to achieve its purpose? Give examples from the article.In other words, does the article use facts, examples, experiences, logic, assumptions, data, sources, expert opinion, and so on to prove his or her position? Be sure to give examples. You could to a fault try to determine if the position is presented as more of a unblemished argument or a Rogerian argument. 3. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the approach the article use? In other words, what would you give up liked to see more of in the article? Less of? What played? What didnt work? Do you detect bias that is ill-judged? Does the author use unreasonable assertions, stereotypes, or faulty information to compel his or her points?Does the author place the opposition in an unfair feeble? Does the author distort the arguments of those who disagree? Does the author fail to recognize the weaknesses in his or her own position? Does the au thor leave out important information? Does the author back up his or her assertions with evidence, or does he or she simply invite assumptions? What would most improve the argument? develop your answers. Remember, we are not arguing for or against the content of these articles we are analyzing what the article attempts to do, how it does it, and if it does so fairly.We should not be concerned closely how we feel somewhat the article. To be clear Your readers should not know what your position is about the subject. Your readers should hardly know whether or not you felt the article was reasonable, well-developed, fair, etc. Do not include personal opinion or personal judgments about the subject matter. Do not include personal narrative. This analysis should be presented in the form of a single essay, complete with a agnomen summon, an introduction, three body carve ups (purpose, approach, and effectiveness), a conclusion, and a full References page.Your analysis should fulfi l the following criteria Is based on a current topic and/or event is between 300-500 words in length, not including the title page, lineation (if used), and References page includes direct quotations and paraphrased passages from the text uses attributive tags that not only work to convey the mood of the writer, but establish him or her as an billet in the field of study avoids personal opinion is written clearly, concisely, and accurately is written solely in third-person is formatted in APA style and includes a References page has been closely edited so that it contains few or no mechanised errors is ordered with a title page, an introduction, three body paragraphs (purpose, approach, and effectiveness), a conclusion, and a full References page. *Note that no one writes a polished essay in a single sitting. Start early and give yourself time for multiple revisions. Analysis Checklist As you work on your analysis, it is a sizable idea to keep the following questions in mind 1. How does this analysis get hold of the assignment criteria? . How close do you feel your analysis reflected the presentation of the sea captain argument? 3. Does this analysis use effective transitions as it progresses from paragraph to paragraph? 4. Does this analysis avoid personal opinion, casual language, or first or second person language? 5. Is there anything in this analysis that could have been left out without losing its effect? 6. Is there anything else that could have been added to this analysis to make it feel more complete? 7. Is this analysis based on a current topic?