This is a set of questions to help you retard your understanding of the material. It is recommended that you do them right after doing the lecture and the readings for that section, and and then check your answers.
1. Consider the following syllogism
If p then q.
p.
q.
a. purloin conditional
b. Concrete conditional
c. Abstract categorical
d. Concrete categorical
The coif answer is A. The syllogism is gyp rather than concrete because it has letters non meaningful words. It is conditional because it uses if and then, not all, some, most, etc.
2. Consider the following syllogism:
all cats are birds.
altogether birds have wings.
All cats have wings.
a. Valid
b. In sensible
c. True
d. two Valid and True
The correct answer is A. This one is a categorical syllogism. It was probably piano to rule out C and D because the conclusion All cats have wings is obviously not true. As farthest as I know, no cats have wings in the real world.
You might have gotten truth confused with rigourousness though, and decided it was also invalid (option B, which is wrong). You can tell that it is valid because of the form.. the conclusion follows logically from the premises. The reason the conclusion ends up existence untrue is that one of the premises is untrue, but that has no mend on validity.
3. The validity of a syllogism depends on
a. The truth of its premises
b. The truth of its conclusion
c. Its form
d. Both the truth of its premises and the truth of its conclusion
The correct answer is C. doubtfulness 2 should have demonstrated this for you, but you may not have understood when you answered question 3. This stuff is hard to retrieve about thats one of the points of the chapter....If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment