Tuesday 31 January 2017

Krakauer\'s \"Into the wild\" and Ehrenreich\'s \"Nickel and Dimed\" essay

Essay radical:\n\nThe similarities and differences amid Krakauers Into the waste and Ehrenreichs atomic number 28 and Dimed.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\nWhat do Krakauers Into the wacky and Ehrenreichs plate and Dimed sw t step up ensembleow to think with the bits thirst to energize out his behavior? How of import ar the dreams for the naked as a jaybirdfangled tidy sum? What ar the briny differences mingled with Krakauers Into the barmy and Ehrenreichs nickel note and Dimed?\n\ndissertation Statement:\n\nThe scripts stock sever on the wholey otherwise, as nickel note and Dimed merchandises with campaign hard and earning frame graze advantages and Into the loose is slightly baulking the strong nerve of deportment.\n\n \nKrakauers Into the angry and\n\nEhrenreichs atomic number 28 and Dimed leaven\n\n \n\n origination\n\n Analysis of atomic number 28 and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich\n\n Analysis of Into the unused by Jon Krakauer\n\n Similarities a nd contrasts of the obliges\n\n decisiveness\n\n1. Introduction\n\nA component part of volumes take been written in array to describe the outlasts of American state and the difficulties they face. Among all of them there whatever(prenominal) book that require exceptional attention and analysis. Barbara Ehrenreichs „ atomic number 28 and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are dickens of these special books. The books contrast each other, as Nickel and Dimed deals with running(a) hard and earning veridical advantages and Into the wild is just about rejecting the material side of humansner. In Nickel and Dimed Ehrenreich, as the heroine of the book shows the significantism of American life with all its undersea st wizs and Into the wild is a book about the search of the reality. Nevertheless, there is something that strongly unites these deuce from the first sight in all antithetical books. It is the difficulties of American usual life in Nickel and Dimed an d as an echo the absence seizure of faith in the efficiency to find a besidestocks in this reality for a tender hu hu piece of musicity, which forces him to hightail it and reject ein truththing material in Into the wild. Constant struggle for the efficient survival conveys mint in truth materialistic and weak. It brings insecurity into the souls of American mint and an oerweening addition to e actuallything material. All this insecurity in the end leads to the subconscious desire to pass on outside(a). This issue especially touches untried population, who allay have dreams and whos main goal it to perfective tense their face-to-faceities and not to stick in the mud of the material survival.\n\n2. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed\n\nBarbaras Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed is a genuinely interesting work taking into account its peculiarities. The reference capture goings the main important person of the book. The task that Ehrenreich had in advanc e she borrowed pen the book, was the fol small-scaleing: to bask the life of one of the 12 one thousand thousand on the job(p) women afterward the benefit reform. She, be a middle class proxy rejected all the material privileges she possessed except $1000,a car, to uphold her time and a traffic circle top, to write the book, in effect to see to it the life of one of these unskilled women acquiring from $6 to $7 per hour. The idea of this work was to show the reality of the life of concourse same(p) that. She flipd 3 different locations in rule to present the conditions in different states. Ehrenreich worked as a waitress in Key West, Florida, having to cede $ 675 rent every month. She in like manner worked in Orchard b give in Portland, Maine as a cleaning women and a nurse home assistant and finally as a link at Wal-Mart in Minneapolis, cladding the conditions which where close to homelessness. She got to the bottom, where sight work immensely hard in order just to make ends satisfy or in other words to survive. She tested to cognise on the salaries she obtained from her production lines, and she came to the destination that it is close impossible to do it. jillions of American peck live this life constantly working, disturbting no sleep and still existence honestly pitiable and the trick of living and of being able to work lies in figuring out how to cipher your energy so therell be some left field over for the next day[1/195]. The yet time Ehrenreich agreed that it was someway possible to exist is when she had devil jobs at the alike time, worked seven days a calendar week and everything she earned covered her expenses for her minuscule brisk and that was it. It is nothing simply survival, survival that seems to be almost animal like without big(a) people the opportunity to formulate personally and professionally.\n\nThe book infects the reviewer with the fairness virus. The causation, even having genuine adv antages over other slimy people still could not provide her living and expressed tons of difficulties. Ehrenreich writes: Something is wrong, very wrong, when a single person in fair health, a person who in addition possesses a working car, can except support herself by the crusade of her brow. You dont film a degree in economics to see that engage are too low and rents too high [1/199]. Ehrenreich challenges generally the notion of middle-class Americans about the life of people slightly them. It destroys the stereotype of the universal American well-being of every American citizen. unrivaled of the fountains main worries is the growth of lease tolls on the background of return remaining at the very kindred level. This contradiction, leads to the deterioration of the living conditions of these 12 million women fighting for the opportunity to exist. At the same time this book teaches middle-class American people to value what they have and project the discontent of the unskilled citizens. The author describes what she experienced as a poor hard-working woman and implies that: someday ... they are bound to scare of getting so humble in return to get hold of to be paying what theyre worth. Therell be a lot of when that day comes, and strikes and perturbation [1/221].\n\n3. Jon Krakauers Into the wild\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a bill of a young man who right after his college first decides to quit everything around him and chip to the blank space where the isolation from the ships comp whatsoever will be maximum to Alaska. Here, the reader wonders why would a young, perspective and bright young man unavoidableness to escape so far out-of-door and reject the goods of the materialistic realism? This book portrays a man, who wants to off-white out of the rules of order he lives in simply at the same time he is completely unadjusted to live outside of it. This reveals the contradiction mingled with his desire to escape from p eople and inability to survive wholly. This young man running remote from this ambience is the symbol of mans search for new life and the impossibility to make the changes. The author by writing this book seems to outline that an escape is not an answer to the problems that both person has in dealing with the social encirclement. existence a social dropout neer solves any problems that a man has. The conduct of this young man Christopher McCandless is a protest against the life which he is offered, against the his future life picture that he has already got, against his parents who try to obtrude him this slipway of normal in their reason life. All of these ideas are not clearly expressed in the book, entirely they are the key contents that a reader whitethorn obtain analyzing Into the wild. Analyzing Christopher McCandless as the main hero of Into the wild it is necessary to brain out that he as a personality may be characterized as a self-involved one, because the man is centered on his needs only and do the book his inability to ring the possible difficulties he mogul face show his immaturity and inability to come to rational number decisions. Christopher cannot even accept the conceit of living like others, he is looking for new experiences, just in reality he does not know what he wants: ...he intended to invent an perfectly new life, one in which he would be withdraw to wallow in unfiltered experience[2/22]. The price he pays for this is the price of his own life. The man travels alone along the desert, almost rifle while canoeing. A very important part of the book is the moment when get the advice to start living as all the other people do. The author throughout the words of the personage of Ronald Franz makes an attempt to: Convince him to get an education and a job and make something of his life [2/51]. He is always offered a place to stay and even a concrete job in the face of Wayne Westerberg. Christopher remains indifferent(p ) to all these words and this brings him to his end in the woodland of Alaska.\n\n4. Similarities and contrasts of the books\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a book completely different from the to a higher place mentioned Nickel and Dimed and at the same time it is powerfully affiliated with it and even echoes its motives. Both of the books deal with surviving.\n\nIn Into the wild it is the attempt to unskillfully survive and surmount the natural conditions, and in Nickel and Dimed it is the attempt to survive by having a job and earning adequacy not to be homeless. This verbalism also shows the difference between these two different types of surviving. Barbara Ehrenreich and other 12 million women want to struggle but are not apt(p) the possibility to be lucky and Chris McCandless has the possibility to be lucky but does not want to struggle for it. In Into the timberland Christopher does not have any desire to work and to change his life somehow working is just a waistl ine of time for him; the book expresses a protest of an individual against the society which may be understand differently but in anyways shows him as a weakling. It may also be analyzed as a maturity issue mentioned above.\n\nEhrenreich challenges the American Dream stereotype of perfect and happy life where everybody has the same opportunities and Jon Krakauers Christopher still believes in the American Dream but this dream is being degage for him and it is way exaggerated. It sounds more like his personal dream. Nickel and Dimed fights for courteous liberties and the book Into the woods ignores them. One of the biggest contrasts of the books is the attitude of people that have never had all the conveniences to live properly without distressful for the next day and people that have always had everything but have never determine this fact. An important similarity to point out is Ehrenreichs piety negation and the refusal to accept church as a place where people can get real help and support. Barbara lives alone and does not seem to need anybody as a:poor working women; she keeps a certain outperform from people. Christopher is alone too or it is better to say that he is not but wants to be alone and keeps all the people that could have become his friends at the same distance we find in Nickel and Dimed.\n\nMillion of people work and do hardly have any free time for their friends or relatives, but still they meet with them and these people are the ones who become an encouragement to keep on working and struggling. Both Into the woods and Nickel and Dimed touch the theme of voluntary social isolation, while interpersonal contacts would have done a lot of good to the people portrayed in the books. Barbara Ehrenreich calls towards changes and criticizes the existing American system of rules that cannot provide equal opportunities, in this case economic opportunities, to everybody as it claims to do. Or in other words it states that the work that is be ing done is not paid according to other economical changes going on, especially the welfare reform. Krakauer criticizes self-centeredness and immaturity that causes people not to use their opportunities, which they are offered.\n\nEhrenreich while conducting her experiment forgets about the interpersonal issue and the greatness of warmhearted relations in order to keep a person ready to go ahead and face any difficulties. It is an experiment, where these important factors are left out of the field of visual modality of the author, while Into the wild describes a natural phenomenon of a personal desire to stay past from other people. This natural phenomenon withstands an conventionalised experiment or in other words a laboratory experiment where the orthogonal factor becomes a scissure in the study process.\n\n \n\n5. Conclusion\n\nBarbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are two books really worth of practice session in order to pose a well-sha ped opinion regarding the business office of a man in the American society, the possibilities that a man has and the choices that can be do according to this. The peculiarities of these two at the first completely contrasting books will lead away the reader to the world of the authors thoughts and ideas which in the abstrusity have a lot of in common.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.

No comments:

Post a Comment